APHC010350622022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23740/2022 Between: 1. THOTA VASUDEVA RAO, S/ O NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OCC.SELF -EPLOYMENT,SS CONVENOR VISAKHA WASTE OIL,MEN'S WELFARE ASSOCIATION, R/O DNO.3 1-29-43 GOVINDA ROAD ALLIPURAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER GAJUWAKA POLICE STATION, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE SRAVAN SHIPPING SERVICESES PVT LTD, SHIPPING SERVICES CHUKKAVANIPALEM MULAGADA VILLAGE MULAGADA(M) VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR G.SAMBA SHIVA RAO, 5. THE SRAVAN SHIPPING SERVICESES PVT LTD, SHIPPING SERVICES CHUKKAVANIPALEM MULAGADA VILLAGE MULAGADA(M) VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER G.SRAYSN KUMAR, 2 6. THE SRAVAN SHIPPING SERVICESES PVT LTD, SHIPPING SERVICES CHUKKAVANIPALEM MULAGADA VILLAGE MULAGADA(M) VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER G.VARUN KUMAR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent no. 2 8s 3 authority trying to dispossessing the petitioners from the petitioner schedule land in Sy. no. 22/2 for an extent of Ac 0.19 cents at Mulagada Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam district with collusion of respondent no.4 to 6, without following due process of law and without any notice to the petitioner without any authority is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art.14, 21 and 300(A) Of Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent no. 285 3 authority not interfere in the petitioner schedule property schedule land in Sy. no. 22/2 for an extent of Ac 0.19 cents at Mulagada Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct respondent no. 286 3 authority not interfere in the petitioner schedule property schedule land in Sy. no. 22/2 for an extent of Ac 0.19 cents at Mulagada Village and Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23740 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent no. 2 8s 3 authority trying to dispossessing the petitioners from the petitioner schedule land in Sy.No. 22/2 for an extent of Ac 0.19 cents at Mulagada Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam district with collusion of respondent Nos.4 to 6, without following due process of law and without any notice to the petitioner without any authority is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art.14, 21 and 300(A) Of Constitution of India and also violation of the principles of natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent no. 285 3 authority not interfere in the petitioner schedule property schedule land in Sy. No. 22/2 for an extent of Ac 0.19 cents at Mulagada Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and pass such.…” 2. Heard Sri Tota Tejeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that on 11.07.2022, the petitioner approached the Gajuwaka Police Station and filed a report. Accordingly, the respondent police have conducted enquiry and during the course of enquiry, it came to light that the subject matter is civil in nature. He would further submit that the police are 4 not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 23740 of 2022 Dated.06.11.2025 UPS 201