Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40535 (RAJ)

PAWAN SAINI @ MONU S/O HEMRAJ SINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13529/2025 · 2025-11-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44549] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13529/2025 Pawan Saini @ Monu S/o Hemraj Sini, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Naieyon Ki Bagichi, Bansur, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, At Present Lodge In The Central Jail, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.131/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District-Kotputli-Behror for offences under Sections 324(4), 132 and 109(2) of BNS and Sections 5, 27 and 25(6) of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that the name of the co-accused-Manish Gurjar @ Rahul, has been mentioned in the FIR, and he has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 08.08.2025. It is further submitted that the present case is one of no injury. Petitioner is behind the bars since 30.06.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. [2025:RJ-JP:44549] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13529/2025] The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Pawan Saini @ Monu S/o Hemraj Sini shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/127