2025:JHHC:33455-DB -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5797 of 2025 Raj Kumar Agrawal, aged about 59 years, S/o Late Shankar Lal Agrawal, resident of Alkapuri, Near Gayatri Mandir, Ratu Road, P.O.-G.P.O, P.S.- Sukhdeo Nagar, Town and District-Ranchi. … … … Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, through its Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel & Training), having office at North Block, Central Secretariat, P.O.-Secretariat North SO, P.S.-Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001. 2. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, having office at 9, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, P.O.-Lajpat Nagar NDC, P.S.-Conought Place, New Delhi-110124. 3. Director General (Union Accounts) office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, having office at 10, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, P.O.-Lajpat Nagar NDC, P.S.-Dariya Ganj, New Delhi-110124. 4. Principal Director (Personnel), having office at the office of Comptroller and Auditor General of India 9, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, P.O.-Lajpat Nagar NDC, P.S.-Conought Place, New Delhi-110124. 5. Deputy Controller & Auditor General of India (HR, IR, Coord. & Legal) office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India 9, P.O. & P.S.-Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Marg, P.O.-Lajpat Nagar NDC, P.S.- Conought Place, New Delhi-110124. 6. Mr. Chandra Mauli Singh, IA & AS (1994) presently posted as Principal Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Town & District-Ranchi. … … … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Raj, Advocate For the UOI: Mr. Prashant Pallav, ASGI Mr. Radha Krishan Gupta, CGC Ms. Shivani Jaluka, A.C. to ASGI For Resp. Nos. 2-5: Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocate For Resp. No.6: Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate --------- 2025:JHHC:33455-DB -2- 02/Dated: 10.11.2025 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedy as available to him under the law. 2. Prayer being innocuous, is allowed. 3. Consequently, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as aforesaid. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, stands disposed of. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 10.11.2025 N.A.F.R. APK/VK.