1 2025:CGHC:42859 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4532 of 2025 1 - Nirmala Agrawal W/o Lt. Subhash Agrawal Aged About 54 Years R/o Flat No. 101, Shriji Heights, Civil Lines, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works House Department And Environment Department, Transportation, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh 3 - Nazul Officer Collectorate Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Raipur Development Authority Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent no. 4 : Mrs. Upasna Mehta, Dy. G. A. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 25/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief: “10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 4 to decide the representation made by the 2 petitioner within a period of 15 days and grant compensation to the petitioner, as per the provision of law. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue any other order, writ, direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in favor of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition is preferred against the arbitrary and illegal action on the part of respondent no. 4 in not deciding the representation made by the petitioner in respect of the land bearing Khasra No. 174, plot no. 183 admeasuring area 65.31 sq. mt. Situated at Pandaritarai, Raipur, C.G. acquired by the respondent no. 4, without initiating land acquisition process and till date the compensation not given for the same. The representation has been made by the petitioner before the Respondent no. 4 i.e. Raipur Development Authority after the order of Nazul Officer vide order dated 16.08.2024 in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner herein praying for the limited relief that the respondent no. 4 may be directed to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondents opposed the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the 3 record with utmost circumspection. 5. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels, respondent no. 4 is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure P/12) in accordance with law, rules and regulations, within 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima