THE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA v. TATYASO @ YELGONDA MALGONDA PATIL
FA/986/2000 · 2025-05-02
Sharmila U Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40531 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40531 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
904 Fa-986-2000.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 986 OF 2000 State of Maharashtra
...Appellant Versus Tatyaso @ Yelgonda Malgonda Patil ...Respondent —————— Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for Appellant-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : 2nd May, 2025.
P. C. :
1. First Appeal has been preferred by the State being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 4th March, 1998 passed in L.A.R. No. 54 of 1993.
2. Reference Court has enhanced the compensation to Rs. 77,840/- from the compensation of Rs. 37,530/- awarded by SLAO.
3. Considering the meager enhancement, this Court is not inclined to entertain the First Appeal. First Appeal is dismissed.
4. In view of the dismissal of First Appeal, pending civil/interim applications do not survive and stand disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Sairaj 1 of
1