Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4053 (UTT)

PRADEEP NAGRATH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/486/2021 · 2025-04-22

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.486 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sahil Mullick, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Mr. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Ayush Gaur, Advocate for respondent no.4. 4. Learned counsel for the State submitted that investigation has been concluded and the final report submitted earlier on 22.06.2021 is affirmed. 5. Instructions are passed on to this Court by State counsel which is made part of record. 6. Since after further investigation final report has again been affirmed, therefore nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition by this Court. 7. Accordingly writ petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 22.04.2025 SK