Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4053 (ORI)

MINATI DEHURI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/37841/2025 · 2026-01-06

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.37841 of 2025 Minati Dehuri …. Petitioner Mr. S. Choudhury, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Behera, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 06.01.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Even though the present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia challenging order dtd.14.10.2025 so passed by Opposite Party No.2 under Annexure-4, but in course of hearing learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly contended that he may be permitted to move Opposite Party No.3 to get the benefit of order dtd.14.10.2025 as vide the said order Commandant, Home Guard, Subarnapur-Opposite Party No.3 was directed to consider the claim of the Petitioner to get the benefit of engagement as a Home Guard afresh. 4. It is accordingly contended that appropriate direction be issued to Opposite Party No.3 to consider the Petitioner’s claim so directed within a stipulated time period. p. 2 p. 2 5. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State on the other hand contended that since Petitioner claiming benefit of order under Annexure-4 has never approached Opposite Party No.3, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition permits the Petitioner to make a grievance before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence to get the benefit of order dtd.14.10.2025, so issued under Annexure-4. 6.1. It is observed that if such a petition is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such petition. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat Judge