Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4053 (AP)

P. Kamalamma, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1916/2022 · 2025-08-05

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010027062022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 1916/2022 Between: 1. P. KAMALAMMA,, W/O. VENKATA RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/ O. DOOR NO.1/514, EAST PALEM, TADIPATRI TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT - 515 411. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NEAR DRDA COMPOUND, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR 4. AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, NEAR CHUKKALUR POST, TADIPATRI TOWN, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NEAR DRDA COMPOUND, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 6. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, NEAR DRDA COMPOUND, 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.1916 of 2022 ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 8. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TADIPATRI MUNICIPALITY, TADIPATRI, 9. RIHANA BEGUM, D/O. HAJI PEERA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. WARD NO.31, H. NO.16-093-4, TADIPATRI TOWN 85 MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD) 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. N RANGA REDDY (SC MC RSEEMA SPSR NLR) 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.1916 of 2022 The Court made the following Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 06.08.2025 PGT