% / / t r '4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ^ MONDAY. THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11565 OF 2025 ■6. P k ? ' / (■ ■f \ '■e'\ -iT*’ Between: Mandapalli Daniel, S/o Jaya Babu, Aged 25 years, R/o D.No. 1-8- 86,Behind Bapuji School, Mandapeta Town, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Accused No.6 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. SHO PS, Rayavaram ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No. 6 in Crime No. 68/2025 dated 23.04.2025 on the file of the Rayavaram Police Station, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Chetan Ponnuru, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following: / 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.ll565 of 2025 Dated 17.11.2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail in Crime No.68 of 2025 of Rayavaram Police Station, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Konaseema District, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.6 herein for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. As seen from the record, the allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.6 is that he, along with the other accused, was indulging in dealing with 2.00 kgs of Ganja, which is not a commercial quantity. The role of the petitioner came to light based on the confession of Accused No.1. After thorough investigation, charge sheet has been filed in this case. The petitioner is a permanent resident of Mandapeta Town, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, and he has got fixed 3. 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.ll565 of 2025 Dated 17.11.2025 abode. Accused Nos.1 to 5 have already been enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge concerned. Although the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that there are four adverse antecedents reported against the petitioner, of which one is under the provisions of ‘the NDPS Act’, it will take a 4. considerable length of time for the learned Trial Court to take up the matter and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Until such time. keeping the petitioner in judicial custody would not serve any purpose. If certain conditions are imposed, the presence of the petitioner during the trial can be secured and the interest of justice would be sub-served. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the petitioner/Accused No.6 this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail with the following stringent conditions: i. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall be enlarged on bail subject to he executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two \ sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Sessions Judge for Trial of the Cases 4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.ll565 of2025 Dated 17.11.2025 under NDPS Act, 1985- Cum-I Additional Sessions Judge, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram. ii. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall appear before the Investigating Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till the conclusion of the Trial. iii. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Investigating Officer concerned, iv. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. V. The petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed. SDI- P.VINOD KUMAR DEPUrgpi01STRAR SECTION OFFICER i //TRUE COPY// For To, 1. The Special Sessions Judge for Trial of the cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-cum-l Additional Sessions Judge, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram. The Superintendent, Central Jail Rajahmundry. East Godavari District. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Rayavaram One CC to Sri. Chetan Ponnuru, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT] One spare copy 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. HIGH COURT DR.YLRJ DATED:17/11/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.11565 of 2025 ALLOWED S 17 NOV 205 ★ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBE^g^S'" TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iSmB :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA R CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11333 OF 2025 , ? Ik! JV 'n 0 I- ?> Iv ■V a Between: Simma Sanyasi Rao @ Sunny, S/o Nookaraju Late,Aged 52 Years,Near Lilitha Theatre Peddha Masjid Center, Peddapuram (A-2) ...Petitioner/Accused No.A-2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Sections 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 (under sections 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C., 1973), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail in Cr. No 343/2025 Peddapuram police station. Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Koppisetti Parvati Devi Counsel for the Respondent : Ms.Akhila Naidu, Assistant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following