PINKY KUMARI D/O GANPAT RAM VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14713/2025 · 2025-10-13
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40522 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40522 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41775] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14713/2025 Pinky Kumari D/o Ganpat Ram Verma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 9, VPO Indarpura, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary-Cum- Commissioner, Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 13/10/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring order dated 07.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9147/2023:Rajeev Kumar Gurjar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and order dated 08.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8348/2023 submits that the controversy in this matter is no more res integra and the matter be disposed of in accordance with judgment dated 28.05.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10548/2023 (Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.) and
[2025:RJ-JP:41775] (2 of 2) [CW-14713/2025]
judgment dated 03.02.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12131/2023 (Pratap Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. & other connected petitions) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that instant writ petition be disposed of on basis of principle of law as already settled by this Hon’ble Court in referred judgment, if the petitioner is squarely covered from the issue raised herein.
3. Having regard to the submissions that the instant writ petition falls within the ambit of principle laid down in the aforesaid judgments, therefore, it is hereby directed that the principle of law as extended in aforementioned writ petition shall be equally applicable in the writ petition and the writ petition is
disposed of in same terms as expressed in Sudarshana Jangid Vs. State (supra) and Pratap Ram Vs. State (supra).
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition and misc. application(s), if any stand disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/22