Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40522 (PNJ)

MAHABIR SINGH AND ANR v. SANJAY JOON

COCP/1600/2025 · 2025-08-18

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 105 Mahabir Singh and another Sanjay Joon, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings order dated Bench of this Court in CWP another vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the direction was issued to the respondent 01.09.2023/06.09.2023 (Annexure P accordance with law within a period of four Court, learned State counsel has filed the Compliance Report dated 13.8.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Swapnil Ravindra Patil, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar. The same is taken COCP-1600-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1600 of 2025 Date of decision : Mahabir Singh and another Versus Joon, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not complying the order dated 12.10.2023 (Annexure P-1 Bench of this Court in CWP-23053-2023 another vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the direction was issued to the respondent “… to look into the legal notice dated 01.09.2023/06.09.2023 (Annexure P-6) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four In pursuance of order dated 15.5.2025 passed by this Court, learned State counsel has filed the Compliance Report dated 13.8.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Swapnil Ravindra Patil, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar. The same is taken 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1600 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-18.08.2025 …..Petitioners Joon, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Divyam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate titled as “Mahabir Singh and another vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the direction was “… to look into the legal notice dated 6) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today.” In pursuance of order dated 15.5.2025 passed by this Court, learned State counsel has filed the Compliance Report dated 13.8.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Swapnil Ravindra Patil, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, Jhajjar. The same is taken on record. Copy VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 18.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper necessary compliance has been made while passing dated 11.8.2025 (Annexure R present petition. said fact and admits that the order dated 12.10.2023 (Annexure P has been complied with and a Sp (Annexure R of the above, the present contempt petition however, with liberty to the petitioners to c Speaking Order with liberty to Order dated 11.8.2025 (Annexure R August 18 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1600-2025 (O & M) thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made while passing dated 11.8.2025 (Annexure R-1); thus, no cause survives in the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the said fact and admits that the order dated 12.10.2023 (Annexure P has been complied with and a Speaking Order dated 11.8.2025 (Annexure R-1) has been passed by the respondent Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the above, the present contempt petition however, with liberty to the petitioners to c Speaking Order, as per law. Accordingly, the present petition stands liberty to the petitioners to challenge the aforesaid Speaking dated 11.8.2025 (Annexure R-1) as per law, if so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 8, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioners. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made while passing a Speaking Order 1); thus, no cause survives in the Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the said fact and admits that the order dated 12.10.2023 (Annexure P-1) eaking Order dated 11.8.2025 1) has been passed by the respondent-authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the above, the present contempt petition may be disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the aforesaid Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of, challenge the aforesaid Speaking as per law, if so advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.19 18.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document