1 2025:CGHC:4969 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2378 of 2018 Durga Prasad Verma S/o Mahavir Prasad Verma Aged About 48 Years R/o Nandini Road, Besids BSBK House, Bhilai, Police Station- Chhawani, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Durg, Civil And Revenue District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Shri Fahim Khan S/o Shri Haji Masuk Khan Aged About 34 Years R/o Sundar Nagar, Qtr. No. 1444, Kohka, Bhilai, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Shri Dinesh Nandulkar S/o S.F. Nandulkar Aged About 35 Years R/o Ramnagar, Supela, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Shri Dhiraj Pandey S/o Dhruv Kumar Pandey Aged About 32 Years R/o Plot. No. 30, Kailash Nagar, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shri Daya Singh S/o Late Shri Nagina Singh Aged About 37 Years R/o C.H. 483, Dhancha Bhavan, Kurud, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate, on behalf of Ms. Mamta Patel, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.2 to 5 : Mr. Vikas Baipai, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 28.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Amiyakant Tiwari, Advocate, on behalf of Ms. Mamta 2 Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent No.1/State, as well as Mr. Vikas Baipai, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents No.2 to 5. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “ Threrefore it is prayed accordingly that to secure the ends of justice, the fi9nal report arsing out of FIR No. 123/2016, P.S. Chhawani, District Durg Annexure P/2 the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1749/2016 Annexure P/3 and theo rder framing charge and dismissal of criminal revision Annexure P/4 may kindly be quashed and set aside; the interest of justice being abuse of process. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court think just and proper may also kindly be allowed in the interest of justice. ” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has been concluded in acquittal, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the private respondents, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar