[2025:RJ-JP:45837] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1241/2025 1. Shankar Lal Jat S/o Shri Heeralal Jat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Jato Ka Mohalla, Chourupura, Lawa, Distt., Tonk (Raj.) 2. Mukesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shoji Ram Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Jato Ka Mohalla, Village Chourupura, Tehsil Malpura, Lawa, Distt. Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Dinesh Kumar, Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Smt. Kalpana Agarwal, District Collector Cum Chairman Plpc, Tonk, Rajasthan 3. Shri Kapil Sharma, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Malpura, District Tonk 4. Shri Pawan Matwa, Tehsildar Malpura, District Tonk 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 14/11/2025 ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10529/2025 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 dh dfFkr vogsyuk ds laca/k esa izLrqr dh xbZ gS] vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 fuEukuqlkj gS%& [2025:RJ-JP:45837] (2 of 2) [CCP-1241/2025] "1. After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioners submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioners to file a representation before the respondents for redressal of their grievances and the authority concerned be also directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a time frame. 2. Considering the aforesaid statement made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid. In case, any representation is submitted by the petitioners, the respondents are expected to hear and decide the same expeditiously as early as possible. 3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular manner. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance withlaw." ;kph i{k dh vksj ls izfrosnu is'k fd;s tkus ij fcuk fdlh foyEc ds fu;ekuqlkj izfrosnu fuLrkj.k dk vkns'k fn;k x;k Fkk] dksbZ fu/kkZfjr vof/k r; ugha FkhA vkns'k fnukad 16-07-2025 dk gS] foi{khx.k dks ;qfDr;qDr volj Hkh izfrosnu ds fuLrkj.k gsrq izkIr ugha gqvk gS] dqN le; yxuk LokHkkfod gSA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g ;kfpdk "Pre-Mature" gS] vr% blh LVst ij ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA Hkfo"; esa ;fn vR;f/kd o vuqfpr foyEc gksrk gS] rks uohu ;kfpdk is'k djus gsrq ;kph i{k Lora= gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /13