Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40511 (JHR)

TATA STEEL LTD, REPRESENTED THRO ITS COMPANY SECRETARY AND CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

WPC/5393/2025 · 2025-11-21

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34764-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5393 of 2025 ------ Tata Steel Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1882 (and an existing Company under the Company Act 2013) having its Registered Office at 24, Homi Modi Street Fort, P.O. & P.S. Homi Mody Street, District Mumbai-400 001 (Maharashtra) bearing Corporate Identification Number as L27100MH1907PLC000260, and having one of its captive Iron Ore mine known as Vijay II Iron Ore mine located at Ghatkuri Reserve Forest, Chaibasa, Jharkhand; represented through its Company Secretary & Chief Legal Officer, Mr. Kanchinadham Parvatheesam, aged about 50 years, son of Shri KSR Murthy, resident of Flat No.502, Anand Smruti, 266, Deodhar Road, PO & PS-Matunga East, Mumbai 400 019 (Maharashtra). …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 2. The Director of Mines, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Nepal House, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 3. The District Mining Officer, Chaibasa, having its office at Chaibasa, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 4. District Forest Officer, Saranda Forest Division, Chaibasa, Chaibasa, having its office at Chaibasa, P.O. Chaibasa, P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand ..... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shray Mishra, AC to AG ------ 06/Dated: 21.11.2025 I.A. No.15498 of 2025 1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for withdrawal of the present writ petition. 2. The reason for withdrawal of the present writ petition has been shown at paragraph-4 of the instant interlocutory application 2025:JHHC:34764-DB 2 based upon the fact that the representation which has been preferred by the writ petitioner is lying pending. 3. Learned A.C. to A.G. appearing for the respondent-State by referring to the counter affidavit has submitted that the representations are under consideration for which a committee has been constituted. 4. Considering the aforesaid fact, the instant application being I.A. No.15498 of 2025 stands allowed and accordingly, disposed of. 5. In consequence thereof, the instant writ petition being W.P.(C) No.5393 of 2025 is allowed to be withdrawn with a liberty that in case, if any adverse order will be passed by the authority concerned, the writ petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same by approaching the appropriate forum. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) 21.11.2025 Rohit/- Uploaded on 24.11.2025