COCP-1703 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 Harminder Singh Bhangu Gurpreet Singh Khaira CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 23.07.2024 (Annexure P Court in CWP others’, whereby it was directed as follows: 2. Assistant Town Planner, learned counsel for the respondent has informed that the Revisional Authority was constituted only on 18.08.2025; 1703-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 Harminder Singh Bhangu Versus Gurpreet Singh Khaira CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vansham Chhabra, Advocate for Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been dated 23.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP-4868-2018 titled as ‘Madan Lal vs. whereby it was directed as follows: “That being so, learned counsel for the submits that let this petition be disposed of, for the present, to enable the parties to contest the revision. However, in the given circumstances, he submits that the Revisional Authority be directed to decide the matter within a specified tim Further, after the matter is decided by the Revisional Authority, the party aggrieved by the order so passed, shall be at liberty to avail such other remedies, as admissible in law. In response, learned State counsel submits that the matter shall be decided within a period of three months from today.” At the very outset, on instructions from Sh. Naveneet Singla, Assistant Town Planner, learned counsel for the respondent has informed the Revisional Authority was constituted only on 18.08.2025; IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1703-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vansham Chhabra, Advocate for Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. filed alleging violation of order 1) passed by a Division Bench of this Madan Lal vs. State of Punjab and whereby it was directed as follows:- That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that let this petition be disposed of, for the present, to enable the parties to contest the revision. However, in the given circumstances, he submits that the Revisional Authority be directed to decide the matter within a specified time. Further, after the matter is decided by the Revisional Authority, the party aggrieved by the order so passed, shall be at liberty to avail such other remedies, as admissible in In response, learned State counsel submits that the ided within a period of three months from At the very outset, on instructions from Sh. Naveneet Singla, Assistant Town Planner, learned counsel for the respondent has informed the Revisional Authority was constituted only on 18.08.2025; filed alleging violation of order 1) passed by a Division Bench of this State of Punjab and petitioner submits that let this petition be disposed of, for the present, to enable the parties to contest the revision. However, in the given circumstances, he submits that the Revisional Authority e. Further, after the matter is decided by the Revisional Authority, the party aggrieved by the order so passed, shall be at liberty to avail such other remedies, as admissible in In response, learned State counsel submits that the ided within a period of three months from At the very outset, on instructions from Sh. Naveneet Singla, Assistant Town Planner, learned counsel for the respondent has informed the Revisional Authority was constituted only on 18.08.2025; RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.11 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1703 whereafter personal hearing was granted to the petitioner on Further, learned counsel for the respondent order shall be passed 3. aforesaid undertaking of lea petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner same in case any cause of action survives or in case, the undertaking given by learned cou 4. 5. required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner 6. 7. 10.09.2025 rishu 1703-2025 -2- whereafter personal hearing was granted to the petitioner on Further, learned counsel for the respondent order shall be passed within a period of 08 weeks from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits aforesaid undertaking of learned counsel for the respondent petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner same in case any cause of action survives or in case, the undertaking given by learned counsel for the respondent is not fulfilled. Heard. In view of the facts noted above, no further direct required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 10.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable whereafter personal hearing was granted to the petitioner on 08.09.2025. Further, learned counsel for the respondent undertakes that the speaking within a period of 08 weeks from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the rned counsel for the respondent, the present petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case any cause of action survives or in case, the undertaking nsel for the respondent is not fulfilled. In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of, with Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No . speaking that in view of the , the present to revive the same in case any cause of action survives or in case, the undertaking is with RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.11 20:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.