RAM GOPAL CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI BHANWARLAL CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15248/2025 · 2025-11-18
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40508 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40508 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48394] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15248/2025 Ram Gopal Choudhary S/o Shri Bhanwarlal Choudhary, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Lamba Hari Singh, Tonk Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Joint Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyotinagar, Jaipur.
4. Chief Block Education Officer, Arati, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 18/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be
directed to consider the case of the petitioner and grant family pension and pay arrear along with 12% interest from due date to the date of payment. b) In the alternative, by an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to get Medical Examination of the petitioner at his expenses conducted through Competent Medical Board to ascertain span of disability of the petitioner and if as per medical Board opinion span of disability of the petitioner is found of old period before the death of his father, then in that eventuality,
[2025:RJ-JP:48394] (2 of 2) [CW-15248/2025] sanction and pay the Family Pension to the petitioner in view of Rule 3 (iii) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) (Second Amendment) Rules 2024 notified vide Notification dated
20.09.2024.
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /53