[2025:RJ-JP:45814] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17000/2025 Punya Ram Meena S/o Late Shri Ramdhan Meena, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Post Baveli, Tehsil Reni, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, (Raj.) 3. The Joint Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel (Gr. 3/complaint), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Pariwahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. By an appropriate order or direction the impugned suspension order dated 04.06.2025 placing the petitioner under suspension w.e.f. 24.05.2025 be declared bad and illegal and same may be quashed and set aside. 2. By an appropriate order or direction the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to continue on his place of posting where he [2025:RJ-JP:45814] (2 of 3) [CW-17000/2025] was working earlier prior to placing of the impugned suspension order dated 04.06.2025. 3. Alternatively by appropriate order or direction respondents be directed to review the suspension order of the petitioner considering the fact that trial is yet to commence ” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by ratio laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India : (2015) 7 SCC 291. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India (supra). 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of judgment as referred herein above by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:45814] (3 of 3) [CW-17000/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /188