[2025:RJ-JP:44628] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16535/2025 Omprakash Chaudhari S/o Shri Gyarsi Lal Jat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Shivsinghpura, Via Samod, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secre- tariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer (Elementary), Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 16.10.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12186/2023 titled Naveen Swami and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 2. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of order dated 16.10.2023 [2025:RJ-JP:44628] (2 of 3) [CW-16535/2025] in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12186/2023 titled Naveen Swami and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 3. The petitioner shall submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days in light of ratio in case of Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 25.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8352/2025 titled as Shivraj Bairwa and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 4 Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of order dated 25.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8352/2025 titled as Shivraj Bairwa and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur on the basis of ration laid down in case of Yogesh Kumar Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan: SB CWP No.3534/2009 decided on 20.01.2014. 5 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case [2025:RJ-JP:44628] (3 of 3) [CW-16535/2025] referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6 Needlees to say that if petitioners are entitled to benefit, then same be extended in terms of the orders as mentioned hereinabove. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of in case of Naveen Swami (supra) and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove and in case of deviation, decide the same with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /103