MUNAB KHAN SON OF SHRI IMAMUDDIN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9881/2025 · 2025-08-06
Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40492 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40492 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30313-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9881/2025
1. Munab Khan Son Of Shri Imamuddin Khan, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Jagner Turkan, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj).
2. Mangu Khan Son Of Shri Idu Khan, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Jagner Turkan, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj).
3. Sakur Khan Son Of Shri Khuda Bux, Aged About 55 Years, At Present Ward Member Of Panchayat Samiti Jagner Turkan, Resident Of Ward No. 04, Jagner Turkan, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj).
4. Annu Khan Son Of Shri Bhor Khan, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Jagner Turkan, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Village Development
And
Panchayatiraj
Department (Panchayatiraj Department), Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj).
3. Sub Divisional Officer, Panchayat Samiti Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Ms. Harshita Thakral, Ms. Dhriti Laddha and Mr. Tanay Goyal Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG assisted by Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Mr. Pranay Sharma, Ms. Divya Rathore and Ms. Anjali Raga
[2025:RJ-JP:30313-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-9881/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 06/08/2025 Since no final order has been passed and the present petition has been filed merely on an apprehension that the name of the Village Panchayat may be changed, though no such change has actually taken place, the present Civil Writ Petition is evidently premature and is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AMIT/67