Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010300232025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1773/2025 Between:
1. RAMAVATH PRASAD, S/O BHIMLA NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS, WORKING AS EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT. PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. NISHANTH KUMAR IAS, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3rd Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them for wilful disobedience and violation of the orders of this Hon'ble and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Court passed in WP.No. 1627/2022 dated 24.02.2023 under Section 10 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the order in W.P.No. 1627 of 2022 before this Honble Court of Andhra Pradesh and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner herein / Respondent on 14-11-2025 vide orders in C.C No. 1773 of 2025, dated 17.10.2025, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. G RAJU The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 24.02.2023 passed in W.P.No.1627 of
2022. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the order dated 24.02.2023 passed in W.P.No.1627 of 2022 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 17.11.2025 TVN
101 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.1773 OF 2025
Date: 17.11.2025 TVN