Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15063 of 2015 ====================================================== Kapileshwar Singh S/o Late Radheshwar Singh Resident of Mohalla Diwai Takiah, Police Station L.N.M.U., District Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Collector, Darbhanga.
3. The Darbhanga Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Commissioner.
4. The Municipal Commissioner, Darbhanga Municipal Corporation, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 14-07-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): (I) For direction to the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to release the land bearing khata no. 159, khesra no. 1197, measuring 6 kathas, Mohalla- Bishanpur situated in Kalyan, P.S.-Mabbi, District-Darbhanga in favour of the petitioner from the acquisition because the master plan of housing scheme under which the land in question was acquired by the State Government for the Darbhanga Regional Development Authority for systematic Development of
Patna High Court CWJC No.15063 of 2015(3) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 Darbhanga region, ceased to exist as the Darbhanga
Regional
Development Authority/Board was dissolved in 2007 and merged in Darbhanga Municipal Corporation with all assets and liabilities. (II) Further any other writ(s), order(s), direction(s) may be issued to which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be appearing before the Revenue Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna in next four weeks.
4. If such petition is filed with all the relevant documents within a period of four weeks, the concerned authority shall take into account the matter, that the matter was pending before the Writ Court while deciding the delay and it is expected that the matter shall be heard on merit.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U