Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4049 (AP)

Sri. Parvathaneni Veera Raghaviah, v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

WP/7662/2016 · 2025-08-19

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010026182016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of August, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.7662 of Between: Sri Parvathaneni Veera Raghaviah and others And State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary and others Counsel for the petitioners: 1. V.Himabindu Counsel for the respondents: Government Pleader for Forests (A.P.) This Court made the following Order: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioners from their land in Ac cents covered by R.S.No Mandal, Krishna District, A issuing any notice and without following any due process of law as arbitrary capricious, illegal and violative of Articles 21 and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of August, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.7662 of 2016 Sri Parvathaneni Veera Raghaviah and others ...Petitioners State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: respondents: Government Pleader for Forests (A.P.) This Court made the following Order: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to rit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioners from their land in Ac.4.50 cents out of Ac No.454/1 part in Katrenipadu village, Andhra Pradesh on 05.03.2016 at 11 a.m issuing any notice and without following any due process of law as arbitrary illegal and violative of Articles 21 & 300-A of Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Wednesday, the Twentieth day of August, Two Thousand and Twenty Five ...Petitioners ...Respondents The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to rit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to 50 cents out of Ac.19.00 Musunuru a.m without issuing any notice and without following any due process of law as arbitrary, A of Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2 respondents not to dispossess them from their land as mentioned above without following due process of law or to pass such other order or orders which this Court deems fit in the interest of justice. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the writ petition is not pressed. 3. In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Date: 20.08.2025 GRL 3 164 HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No.7662 of 2016 Date:20.08.2025 GRL 4