1 2025:CGHC:44852 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4556 of 2025 Damyanti Vaishnav W/o Sachidanand Vaishnav Aged About 62 Years Erstwhile Sarpanch, Village And Gram Panchayat Amlipali (B), Janpad Panchayat And Tehsil Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh R/o Village And Gram Panchayat Amlipali (B), Janpad Panchayat And Tehsil Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (Camp), Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Bed Ram Sidar Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Amplipali (B), R/o Village - Karradodhi, Gram Panchayat - Kharwani Bade, Tehsil - Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Upasna Mehta, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief: “10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be 2 pleased to call for the records, pertaining to case of petitioner in unregistered appeal pending before the respondent, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to register and decide the appeal preferred by petitioner pending since 30.04.2024 expeditiously, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to respondent no. 2 to register and decide the appeal titled as “Smt. Damyanti Vaishnav Vs. State of C.G. & Ors.” within a time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposed the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels for the respective parties, respondent no. 2 is directed to register and decide the appeal titled as “Smt. Damyanti Vaishnav Vs. State of C.G. & Ors.” in accordance with law, rules and regulations, within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if there is no legal 3 impediment. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima