Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40487 (KAR)

R. SEETHALAKSHMI v. H.L. SREENIVASA GUPTA

CRP/366/2019 · 2025-10-28

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42928 CRP No. 366 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 366 OF 2019 BETWEEN: R. SEETHALAKSHMI W/O H.L. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS HOUSE WIFE, SRINIVASA NILAYA HULIYAR ROAD, HIRIYUR PRESENTLY RESIDING AT #971/5, FLOOR, 16/A MAIN, 15TH CROSS, A SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BANGALORE - 560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. UDAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H.L. SREENIVASA GUPTA S/O LATE M. LAKSHMIPATHYSETTY AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS 2. H S NAGARAJ S/O H L SREENIVASA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/A HULIYAR ROAD HIRIYUR - 577 598. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42928 CRP No. 366 of 2019 3. H.L. SRIDHARA GUPTA S/O LATE M. LAKSHMIMATHY SETTY SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRS 3(A). BHARATHI W/O LATE H.L. SRIDHARA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 3(B). SREEDEVI D/O LATE H.L. SRIDHARA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 3(C). R.H.S CHETHAN S/O LATE H.L. SREEDHARA GUPTA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 3(A) TO 3(C) ARE RESIDING AT GUPTA BUILDING, GANDHI CIRCLE, HIRIYUR - 577 598. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.07.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.10 IN OS NO.21/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., HIRIYUR DISMISSING THE IA NO.10 FILED UNDER ORDER XXIII R1[3] R/W.SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42928 CRP No. 366 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo on 08.12.2020. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner submits that, the above civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 19.07.2019 passed on I.A.No.10 in Original Suit No.21/2017 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hiriyuir, now the main suit itself is disposed on merits of the case. Hence the above Civil Revision Petition is become infructuous. Wherefore, the petitioner prays this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dispose the above Civil Revision Petition as become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 CT: BHK