NEMI CHAND PARTH S/O GHANSHYAM PARTH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/991/2025 · 2025-05-09
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4048 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19648] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 991/2025 Nemi Chand Parth S/o Ghanshyam Parth, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Golana, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Ms. Anjali Sharma Mr. Rahul Verma Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/05/2025
1. In the instant writ petition, petitioner raised a grievance for not considering his candidature for the post of Nursing Officer under the category of OBC-NCL, pursuant to Advertisement dated 05.05.2023 and placed reliance on his Caste certificate dated 29.01.2021, however, counsel for respondents has disclosed that indeed petitioner submitted Caste certificate dated 23.12.2022 under the category of OBC-CL.
2. This Court finds that the certificate dated 23.12.2022, issued to petitioner under the category of OBC-CL and placed before the
[2025:RJ-JP:19648] (2 of 2) [CW-991/2025] respondents, has been suppressed by the petitioner before this Court and petitioner has not come with clean hands, hence, writ petition deserves to be dismissed with heavy cost, due to concealment of the correct facts and misleading the Court.
3. However, counsel for petitioner, showing the plight of petitioner, that he is an unemployed person and aspiring for appointment on the post of Nursing Officer and such mistake was not committed deliberately, but has happened bonafidely, this Court refrains itself from imposing the cost, however, permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/20