Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40478 (RAJ)

RAJJU @ RAJU @ RAJNATH S/O GIRRAJ @ SITARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15885/2025 · 2025-12-19

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51395] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15885/2025 Rajju @ Raju @ Rajnath S/o Girraj @ Sitaram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Ramsingh Ki Dhani, Near Shiv Mandir, Jairoli, Thana Tijara, District Alwar (At Present Confined At District Jail, Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/12/2025 1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.309/2022 registered at Police Station Uniara, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC, Sections 66C, 66D I.T. Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. However, as per petitioner, no offence under the Act of 1989 was found to be made out. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the account in question was never opened by the petitioner and it was opened by others on the basis of forged documents; as well as the mobile number linked with the Bank Account is also not of the petitioner, still petitioner has falsely been implicated in the FIR in question. He is behind the bars since 15.10.2025. Allegations levelled against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. There are [2025:RJ-JP:51395] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15885/2025] no criminal antecedents against the petitioner nor is there any complaint against him/ his mobile number on National Cybercrime Reporting Portal Helpline No.1930. Trial against the petitioner is likely to take considerably long time. Hence, a prayer has been made to grant bail to the petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In view of the fact that offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, hence, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Rajju @ Raju @ Rajnath S/o Girraj @ Sitaram shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.309/2022 registered at Police Station Uniara, District Tonk on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. [2025:RJ-JP:51395] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15885/2025] (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) He shall regularly mark his attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /141