PASUPULETI VENKATA MURALI MOHAN RAO v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
WP/26675/2021 · 2025-10-28
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40478 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40478 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010441562021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26675 OF 2021 Between:
1. PASUPULETI VENKATA MURALI MOHAN RAO, S/o Late Satyanarayana, Aged 76 years, Occ Retd. Employee, R/o Door No. 7-5-13, Pandurangapuram,Visakhapatnam-530003. ...Petitioner AND
1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by the Special Chief Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam.
3. The Station House Officer, III-Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent authority in not registering the complaint in pursuance of the petitioner's representation dated 20.09.2021 as arbitrary, illegal, null and void, against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice, violative of section 18A of THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES
(PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 and also grave disobedience of the orders of the Apex Court reported in Review Petition (Crl.) No. 228 of 2018, and consequently direct the official respondents jointly and severally to award compensation for latches committed in their statutory obligations and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent authority to forthwith register complaint in pursuance of the petitioner representation dated: 20.09.2021, under i. Sections 3(2)(ii), 3(1)(p , 3(1)(q) of the SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989 ii.Sections 211,209,420,464,471,IPC pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to expedite the hearing of the Writ Petition No. 26675 of 2021 and to Counsel for the Petitioner: ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26675 OF 2021
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent authority in not registering the complaint in pursuance of the petitioner's representation dated 20.09.2021 as arbitrary, illegal, null and void, against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice, violative of section 18A of THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT ACT, 2018 and also grave disobedience of the orders of the Apex Court reported in Review Petition (Crl.) No. 228 of 2018, and consequently direct the official respondents jointly and severally to award compensation for latches committed in their statutory obligations and pass..…”
2. Heard Sri A.Sai Naveen, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, it is a case of non registration of FIR.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner through Spandana to the Superintendent of Police was closed, as the petitioner did not turn up for the enquiry conducted in the matter.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be
disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue his matter with the police.
6. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh representation to the police. On filing such representation police are directed to act according to the law within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 29.10.2025 KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
89
WRIT PETITION NO: 26675 OF 2021
Dated 29.10.2025 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.26675 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
1
29.10.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP, J KKV