KASINA GANGADHARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/25647/2025 · 2025-12-22
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40477 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40477 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010484812025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. KASINA GANGADHARA RAO, S/O LATE KOTESU, HINDU, OCC CULTIVATION, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, D.NO.2 VILLAGE AND POST. NEAR WEAVERS SOCIETY, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PR AND RD) ROOM NO103, GROUND FLOOR, BUILDING NO 5 AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PR AND RD, PVS ICON BUILDING, TADEPA ANDHRA PRADESH
3. DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP,
4. DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, AP
5. EXTENSION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PRAND RD) MPP GARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTR AP, 6. PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP
6. PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25647/2025 KASINA GANGADHARA RAO, S/O LATE KOTESU, HINDU, OCC CULTIVATION, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, D.NO.2- VILLAGE AND POST. NEAR WEAVERS SOCIETY, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PR AND RD) ROOM NO103, GROUND FLOOR, BUILDING NO 5 AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PR AND RD, PVS ICON BUILDING, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 501 DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP, DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, AP EXTENSION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PRAND RD) MPP GARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTR AP, 6. PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI KASINA GANGADHARA RAO, S/O LATE KOTESU, HINDU, OCC- 161, AMPOLU VILLAGE AND POST. NEAR WEAVERS SOCIETY, GARA MANDAL, ...PETITIONER PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PR AND RD) ROOM NO103, GROUND FLOOR, BUILDING NO 5 THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT LLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP, DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATH OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, AP EXTENSION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PRAND RD) MPP GARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, AP, 6.
PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, AMPOLU VILLAGE, GARA
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare action of the respondents 5 and 6 in not mutating the name of the petitioner vide house no. 2/161, Ghandi Nagar street, apolu village, gara mandal, Srikakulam District, AP is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and it amounts violation of article 14,16,21 and 300A of the constitution of the India, and direct the respondent no 5 and 6 to muted the petitioners name vide house 2/161, Ghandi Nagar street, ampolu village, gara mandal, Srikakulam District , AP Interms of the registered will vide document no 35/2020 dated 3/6/2020 in the name of petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 17/05/2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following:
ORDER
The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are not mutating his name for house No.2/161, Ghandi Nagar Street, Ampolu village, Gara Mandal, Srikakulam District, despite submission of representation. 2. The learned Standing Counsel by placing on record the written instructions dated 30.10.2025 of the Panchayat Secretary, Ampolu Village, submitted that the subject house bearing assessment No.909 is in the name of mother of the petitioner, who has three sons and all the three sons are seeking mutation in their names. 3.
Since the petitioner submitted a representation for mutation, if mutation cannot be done in his favour owing to rival claims made by his brothers, the authorities have to pass a reasoned order on the said representation. 4. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the authorities to pass a reasoned order on the representation made by the petitioner within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED 23rd day of December, 2025. RR