APHC010587512022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35472/2022 Between: 1. DASARI PRABHAVATHI, W/O DASARI VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8-1-1, AKULA VEEDHI, SIDDOUT TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. DASARI VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O DASARI VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RIO D.NO. 8-1-1, AKULA VEEDHI, SIDDOUT TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. DASARI SUSEELA,, W/O.DASARI SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8/3, AKULA VEEDHI, SIDDOUT TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. DASARI SIVA,, S/O DASARI VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8-1-1, AKULA VEEDHI, SIDDOUT TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECERETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILIDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SIDDOUT POLICE STATION, SIDDOUT, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. NAGA SUBBAMMA, W/O SIVAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, S.RAJAMPETA VILLAGE, SIDHOUT MANDAL, YAR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with the property rights of the petitioners for the purpose of evicting them unlawfully from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property, total admeasuring Ac.0.20 Cents situated Sy.No.64/1B1C4C4A2A, at Siddout Gram Panchayat and Mandal, YSR 2 Kadapa District by resorting to an unlawful conduct, without authority of law under the influence of the political dispensation and powers, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently restrain the 3rd respondent against interfering with our fundamental right to life, liberty and right to live with dignity, peaceful possession of the property belonging to us, total admeasuring Ac.0.20 cents situated in Sy.No.64/1B1C4C4A2A, at Siddout Gram Panchayat and Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGAM CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering with the property rights of the petitioners for the purpose of evicting them unlawfully from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property, total admeasuring Ac.0.20 Cents situated Sy.No. 64/1B1C4C4A2A, at Siddout Gram Panchayat and Mandal, YSR Kadapa District by resorting to an unlawful conduct, without authority of law under the influence of the political dispensation and powers, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently restrain the 3rd respondent against interfering with our fundamental right to life, liberty and right to live with dignity, peaceful possession of the property belonging to us, total admeasuring Ac.0.20 cents situated in Sy.NO. 64/1B1C4C4A2A, at Siddout Gram Panchayat and Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on instructions would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and unofficial respondent and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law with regard to the subject matter. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 35472 of 2022 17.11.2025 Mjl /*