SHEETAL PRASAD AND 3 ORS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/29590/2018 · 2025-10-09
Jai Prakash Tiwari
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40468 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40468 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29590 of 2018 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Jaysing Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the order dated 09.03.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalitpur, as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 8334 of 2012; titled Ram Kumari vs. Sheetal Prasad and others, under Sections 452, 354A, 354B, 323, 504, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Narahat, District Lalitpur, on the basis of compromise, so far it relates to the present applicants. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in compliance of the order dated 27.08.2025 passed by this Court, both the parties filed compromise deed before the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Lalitpur, and the concerned court vide its order dated 22.09.2025 verified the said compromise in the presence of the applicants and opposite party no. 2, copy of which is annexed as Annexure- S.C.A.-1 to the short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the trial court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served, if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nanhe Lal Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jaysingh Yadav Sheetal Prasad And 3 Ors .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, is also present. He has no objection to the statement, made above. 6. In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of justice that the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed. 7. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the compromise made by the applicants as well as opposite party no. 2.
The entire proceedings of the order dated 09.03.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalitpur, as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 8334 of 2012; titled Ram Kumari vs. Sheetal Prasad and others, under Sections 452, 354A, 354B, 323, 504, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Narahat, District Lalitpur, as also the entire proceedings of the said case is hereby quashed, so far as it relates to the applicants herein. October 10, 2025 Brijesh A482 No. 29590 of 2018 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad