Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40466 (AP)

JMC CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16756/2025 · 2025-11-17

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010326712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16756/2025 Between: 1. JMC CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY S.KAMAL BASHA S/O S.AIII, AGE 53 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O H.NO.27-972/1, TELECOM COLONY, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE ENGINEERIN CHIEF R AND B, ADMN AND NDB., VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER R AND B CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER R AND B DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K.V.L. Narasimha Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings. 2. Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, (R&B) Division dated 13.11.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instruction would indicate that the payments were made in favour of the Writ Petitioner on 12.11.2025. 4. Since the amounts have been paid, this Court is of the opinion that no further consideration is necessary in this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:18.11.2025 Vns