Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40463 (AP)

M. Narayana Murthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/40134/2018 · 2025-11-17

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010832802018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 40134/2018 Between: 1. M. NARAYANA MURTHY, S/O. MUNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.1-170/A, SETTIPALLE, GUDIPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517 425 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, PALAMANERU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUPPAM RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, /SHO, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action the respondents not taking action on the complaint made by the petitioner 2 on 07.09.2018 and 22.10.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to register the case and investigate the same as per the directions of the Honorable Apex Court (Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported judgment in 2014 (2) SCC page 1 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to register the case on the complaint made by the petitioner to the respondents on 07.09.2018 and 22.10.2018 pending disposal writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.40134 OF 2018 ORDER: Sri C.Prakash, learned counsel for the writ petitioner appeared through V.C. would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 18.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 37 WRIT PETITION No:40134 OF 2018 Date: 18.11.2025 W PSK