Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40461 (AP)

BOYA NAGESWARAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17293/2023 · 2025-11-02

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010337332023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17293 of 2023 Between: 1. BOYA NAGESWARAMMA, W/O BOYA PEDDIRAJULU, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6-31A, PAPINENIPALYAM, GARLADINNE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ASSIGNMENT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, GARLADINNE MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the endorsement vide Rc.No.B/235/2022, Dt.09.11.2022 issued by the 5th respondent in rejecting the request of the petitioner for granting of assignment in respect of land in Sy.No.66 to an extent of Ac.2.55 cents situated at Garladinne Village and Mandal, Ananthapuramu District as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the 2 respondents to grant assignment in favour of petitioner in respect of land in Sy.No.66 to an extent of Ac.2.55 cents situated at Garladinne Village and Mandal, Ananthapuramu District and also further direct not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to avail remedy before the authorities and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 03.11.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17293 of 2023 Date: 03.11.2025 siva