1 2025:CGHC:36983 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8721 of 2023 1 - Hilesh Sahu S/o Shri Harakh Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o Harsh Tarang Niwas, Gulab Nagar, Devpuri, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 2 - Under Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Forest And Climate Changes, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Conservator Of Forest Circle Raipur, Naya Raipur Dist. Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Circle Officer Nawapara Circle, Thanoud Parisar, Raipur Dist. Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Palash Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondents. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly issue an appropriate writ in the quash the impugned order Annexure P/1 dated 29/09/2023 passed by the respondent and hold that the petitioner. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct the respondents No. I to 4, should be stopped for further action. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct the petitioner should be allowed to stay in That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct the petitioner should be allowed to stay in Division Raipur, District- Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. 3 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.” 2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat