Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:37210 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5750 of 2025
1. Shamim Ansari, son of late Jasmuddin Miyan, aged about 32 years, resident of village Ichak, P.O., P.S. and District-Latehar
2. Jilani Ansari @ Md. Jilani Ansari, aged about 39 years, son of Akhtar Ansari
3. Shahil Ansari @ Sahid Ansari, son of Md. Mokhtar Ansari, aged about 29 years, Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are resident of village Pochra, P.O, P.S. and District-Latehar, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners
:Mr. Sahid Yunus, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P.
03/ 11.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 104/2025, registered under sections 458, 307, 323, 325, 387 and 34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegations are made against the petitioners of interfering with the construction of graveyard. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 5 of the petition and case diary is also silent with regard to criminal antecedent. He then submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties which has come in para 35 to 39 of the case diary. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of interfering with the construction of graveyard.
5.
Considering that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 5 of the petition and case diary is also silent with
( 2025:JHHC:37210 )
regard to criminal antecedent and further the matter has been compromised between the parties which has come in para 35 to 39 of the case diary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar, in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 104/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.11.12.2025
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-