APHC010522342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 27136/2025 Between: 1. KOTTE CHANDRAIAH, W/O. PENCHALAIAH, AGED 69 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O. D.NO.11-9, SIVA SANKARAPURAM, CHINNAORAMPADU VILLAGE, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT (EARLIER KADAPA DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET REVENUE DIVISION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 6. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, CHINNAORAMPADU 2 VILLAGE, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not regularizing the land of the petitioner admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.27 Cents in Sy.No.31/2 (New Obulavaripalli Mandal,Sy.No.31/2B) of Chinnaorampadu Village, Annamayya District, by updating/removing the Dots in the R.S.R, despite recommendation reports of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 pursuant to Application No-Applicationanddt.26.03.2024No.TTAOl 2400119186 DTL240703047236 dt.03.07.2024 made by the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, Consequently direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to regularize the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.2.27 Cents in Sy.No.31/2 (New Sy.No.31/2B) of Chinnaorampadu Village Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District, by removing the Dots and updating the R.S.R and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to consider the recommendation reports forwarded by Respondent Nos.5 and 6 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law with respect to land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.2.27 Cents in Sy.No.31/2 (New Sy.No.31/2B) of Chinnaorampadu Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not regularizing the land of the petitioner admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.27 Cents in Sy.No.31/2 (New Obulavaripalli Mandal,Sy.No.31/2B) of Chinnaorampadu Village, Annamayya District, by updating/removing the Dots in the R.S.R, despite recommendation reports of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 pursuant to Application No-Application and dt.26.03.2024 No.TTAOl 2400119186 DTL240703047236 dt.03.07.2024 made by the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, Consequently direct Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to regularize the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.2.27 Cents in Sy.No.31/2 (New Sy.No.31/2B) of Chinnaorampadu Village Obulavaripalli Mandal, Annamayya District, by removing the Dots and updating the R.S.R and pass or orders….” 2. Heard Sri Rachuri Lakshmikar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents. 3. On instructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that on applications made by the petitioner, the respondent nos.5 and 6 submitted recommendation reports. In view of the same, to verify the records and to pass orders requested further time. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the respondent nos.2 to 4 are directed to consider the applications submitted by the 4 petitioner, by taking into consideration the reports of respondent nos.5 and 6, and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 03.11.2025 RD 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.27136 OF 2025 03.11.2025 RD