Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40450 (KAR)

SMT. MALLIKA v. THE CIVIC COMMISSIONER

WP/31259/2025 · 2025-10-28

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42956 WP No. 31259 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 31259 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MALLIKA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, W/O. MR. VENKATESH, RESIDING AT BWSSB, WESTERN DIVISION, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CIVIC COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562117 2. SRI. MAHADEVAIAH. B. C. HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. CHANNAPPA, RESIDING AT BWSSB, WESTERN DIVISION, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 14.07.2025 AND FINAL NOTICE DATED 01.08.2025, ISSUED Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42956 WP No. 31259 of 2025 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 WHICH ARE PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-A AND B. THE PETITIONER SUBMITS THAT WITHOUT ANY JURISDICTION, THE R1 HAD ISSUED THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 10/09/202, FOR THE SECOND TIME, WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file reply to the notices which are impugned herein. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the memo filed, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to submit appropriate reply to the notices impugned herein. The respondent No.1 shall proceed in accordance with law after considering the reply. SD/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE