1 2025:CGHC:5053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5176 of 2024 1 Dimple Tamboli D/o Shivshankar Tamboli Aged About 24 Years R/o - Behind Laxminarayan Mandir, Plosay Para Patwari Chawl Durg Tehsil And District - Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal (Cg Vyapam) Vyapam Bhawan North Block Sector 19, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District - Chhattisgarh, 2 Exam Controller Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Parikasha Mandal (Cgvyapm) Vyapam, Bhawan North Bloc Sector 19, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.), Andhra Pradesh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Shri Mayur Khandelwal on behalf of Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge 2 Order on Board 28/01/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a directions towards the respondent authority to correct the name of the petitioner father as “Shiv Shanker Tamboli” instead of “Shiv Shankar Tamboli” in the TET result of 2024 on the basis of 10th class mark-sheet as well as 12th class mark-sheet. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2024 was conducted by the respondent and the petitioner submitted the OnLine form for the same. The Mark- sheet was also issued in which the petitioner was found successfully eligible. He submits that while filling of OnLine form inadvertently petitioner’s father name has been filled as “Shiv Shankar Tamboli” in the form and his name has been shown as “Shiv Shankar Tamboli” instead of “Shiv Shanker Tamboli” in the TET result. This petition has been filed without any delay and as soon as the petitioner realized his mistake has approached this Court and also made representation to the respondent. He further submits that if the correction is not made, it would cause prejudice to the petitioner as name of his father is wrongly reflected in the TET result and by making correction in the said result, is not going to cause any loss or prejudice to the respondent and it will not make any change in the result of the petitioner. Therefore, the 3 relief as claimed may be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner move a fresh representation seeking necessary correction as stated in the writ petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within 50 days. 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority that, if any representation along with the documentary proof in support of his claim is filed by the petitioner for correction of father’s name in the TET result 2024, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of 50 days in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti