NIKHIL S/O LATE SHRI CHANDRAPRAKASH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18341/2025 · 2025-12-10
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40444 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40444 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50272] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18341/2025 Nikhil S/o Late Shri Chandraprakash, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Near Petrol Pump, Uchchain, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. District Education Officer, (Head Quarter), Elementary Education, Bharatpur (Raj.)
4. Chief Block Elementary Education, Uchchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
5. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Sahna, Block Uchchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and:- An appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to given appointment to petitioner on compassionate basis on any suitable post with all consequential service benefit in the larger interest of justice. Respondents may kindly be directed not taken any prejudice action against the petitioner on account of filing this writ petition.
[2025:RJ-JP:50272] (2 of 2) [CW-18341/2025] issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /25