Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40442 (CHH)

UMESH JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9760/2025 · 2025-08-24

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42878 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9760 of 2025 1 - Umesh Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Madan Jaiswal Aged About 41 Years R/o- Baniyapara, Village- Bargidih, Tehsil- Lundra, District Surguja Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Additional Secretary Department of Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Collector Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 4 - Jila Panchayat Surguja Through Chief Executive Officer, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 5 - Janpad Panchayat Lundra Through Chief Executive Officer, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) 6 - Janpad Panchayat Mainpath Through Chief Executive Officer, Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For State-respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 25-08-2025 Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN 2 1. The petitioner, who is working as Panchayat Secretary has been transferred from Gram Panchayat Sakhouli, Janpad Panchayat Lundra, District Surguja, Ambikapur to Gram Panchayat Rajapur, Janpad Panchayat Mainpat, District Surguja vide transfer order dated 06.08.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order the petitioner wants to move representation before the transfer authority, therefore, he may be permitted to avail the remedy of representation before the concerned authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any objection on the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the writ petition. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to move his representation before the respondent No.4 within a week and in the eventuality of filing the representation within a week from today by the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till then no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned transfer order dated 06-08-2025. 6. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today before respondent No.4. 7. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil