1 2025:CGHC:46472 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 4 of 2022 Meera Bai D/o Late Lakhan Singh, W/o Late D.S. Parihar, Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Chuikhadan, Tahsil Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Thakur Purushottam Singh S/o Late Lakhan Singh Thakur, Aged About 56 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ramakant Singh, S/o Late Lakhan Singh Thakur, Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Sita Bai D/o Late Lakhan Lal, W/o Chandrpal Singh Thakur, Aged About 55 Years R/o Bemetara, Tahsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sulekha Bai D/o Late Lakhan Singh, W/o Krishna Kumar Singh, Aged About 53 Years R/o Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Ms. Jyoti Koushik, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate For Respondent No.5/State : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 11.9.2025 BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.09.12 17:07:04 +0530 2 1. This misc. appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(t) of the CPC has been filed against Order dated 27.01.2021 passed by Upper District Judge, Khairagarh, distt. Rajnandgaon in Misc. Civil Appeal No.02/2016, whereby application under Order 9 Rule 9 read with Order 41 Rule 19 of the CPC, filed by the appellant has been rejected. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that sole appellant Meera Bai has died issueless on 27.6.2025 and her husband had already died, therefore, no application for substitution to bring her Lrs has been filed, hence, this appeal has become abated. 3. In view of the above submission, since no application for substitution of Lrs of deceased appellant has been filed, instant appeal has become abated on account of death of sole appellant. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed of as having become abated. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini