Kaligithi Durga Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/37675/2022 · 2025-11-17
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40436 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40436 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010626652022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 37675/2022 Between:
1. KALIGITHI DURGA PRASAD, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGE 26 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. 4-41, MAGATAPALLI (V), MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT., 533 2,18. 2. SARELLA SAI NANDINI @ KALIGITHI SAI NANDINI, W/O.KALIGITHI DURGA PRASAD, AGE 23 YEARS, HINDU, STUDENT, R/O.4-41, MAGATAPALLI (V), MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT., 533 248. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT
A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT., A.P.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.,
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAM POLICE STATION, NAGARARN, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
5. SARELLA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
6. SARELLA DHARMARAO, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
7. SARELLA RAMANA, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
8. SARELLA MADHAVARAO, S/O. DHARMARAO, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
9. SARELLA SHIVANANDAM, S/O. DHARMARAO, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
10. SARELLA VEERA VENKATA RAYUDU BHADRI, S/O. RAMANA, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M),
2
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
11. SARELLA TEJA SAI, S/O. RAMANA, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
12. VIPPARTHI SATYANARAYANA, C/O.YALANGI ARJI,BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
13. UNDRU BALAJI, S/O. JANAKEERHI,
BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
14. SARELLA VENUGOPALARAO, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
15. SARELLA KUMARI, S/O BUJJI MASTAR, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
16. DAKE YADAGIRI, S/O. RAMA KRISHNA, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
17. SETTIBATTULA SRINU, APPANNAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR. B R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
18.
VIPPARTHI STEEVEN, S/O. VERRIYYA, BALAJI NAGAR, MAGATAPALLI, MAMIDIKUDURU (M), DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 to take necessary action/steps to protect my life and life of the 2nd petitioner from the hands of the respondents 5 to 18 and direct the respondents 3 86 4 to take necessary preventive steps to protect our lives as the acts of them are violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to take appropriate action against the 5th respondent and others who are involved in Crime No.196/2022 registered at 4th respondent as we are the victims in such crime and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SIMHACHALAM KARUKOLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 to take necessary action/steps to protect my life and life of the 2nd petitioner from the hands of the respondents 5 to 18 and direct the respondents 3 & 4 to take necessary preventive steps to protect our lives as the acts of them are violation of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to take appropriate action against the 5th respondent and others who are involved in Crime No.196/2022 registered at 4th respondent as we are the victims in such crime and pass ....”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on written instructions would submit that on the complaint of the Petitioners, respondent Police called respondents 5 to 18 and in the presence of the Petitioners, they have done counselling and in the counselling, respondents 5 to 18 assured that they do not involve in the affairs of the Petitioners. As per the assurance, petitioners have no life threat on their marital life and would submit that this writ petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
4
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 37675 of 2022
18.11.2025
Mjl /*