[2025:RJ-JP:27377] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3854/2025 1. Raman Jat S/o Shri Phool Chand Jat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o 846, Shiv Mandir Ke Samne, Village Samod, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. 2. Rahul Ola S/o Shri Vijay Ola, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Vikash Kumar Kumhar S/o Shri Gouri Shankar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Raniwala Chok, Samod, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Aman Lodha for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 22/07/2025 1. The present petition is filed under Section 528 B.N.S.S. seeking directions for quashing of the FIR No.159/2025 registered at Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural for offence under Sections 140(3), 127(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of BNS, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise on 26.06.2025. It is further submitted that respective parties are aged approximately, 21 and 23 years respectively. [2025:RJ-JP:27377] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3854/2025] 3. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the instant dispute is in personam in nature and both the parties have settled their disputes amicably. 4. Heard and considered. 5. In this regard, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of the aforesaid is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-compoundable.” 6. In view of legal proposition of law laid down by the Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 7. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 159/2025 registered at Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural with all consequential proceedings, is hereby quashed and set aside. 8. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/254