HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12067 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Ms. Bindu Kumari, learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. By means of the instant bail application, the applicant, Yogesh Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar, is seeking bail in Case Crime No. 673 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Khurja Nagar, District Bulandshahr. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the F.I.R. was lodged against three persons including the applicant. False allegation has been made that with the aid of two other accused named in the F.I.R. the applicant got executed a sale deed in favour of informant while submitting forged documents of owner in which his heirs were shown wrongly. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged sale deed was not executed by the applicant, rather it was executed by another co- accused, Pankaj in favour of informant in which the applicant was the only a witness, thus, applicant has no role to play in commission of offence and he has been made accused with false and frivolous allegations due to ulterior motive. The applicant is languishing in jail since 05.03.2025, with no previous criminal antecedents into his credit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anupama Parashar, Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, Satendra Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Bindu Kumari, G.A. Yogesh Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the applicant is the main accused. The said land was of different person in which by showing one co-accused Sushil Kumar alias Toma, as owner of the said land he got prepared forged papers and got executed the alleged sale deed, therefore, innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage and he does not deserve any indulgence. 5. Keeping in view submissions of learned counsel for the parties, gravity of offence, nature of allegations and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, no case for bail is made out. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of applicant-Yogesh Kumar @ Yogendra Kumar, is rejected. September 3, 2025 Mustaqeem. BAIL No. 12067 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad