[2025:RJ-JP:47772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18239/2025 Bansi Lal Constable (Driver) No. 1122/805, S/o Shri Badaram Meena, Aged About 66 Years, Worked At O/o Superintendent Of Police, Pratapgarh (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. DGP, Rajasthan Police, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Pratapgarh (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i) By appropriate writ, order or direction, direct the respondents to release the benefits of Technical cadre/wing to petitioner from the date of completion of 18 and 27 years service and release all consequential benefits with interest; ii) Or Alternate, direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner in the light of Civil Appeal No.1766/15 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Banney Khan and thereafter, [2025:RJ-JP:47772] (2 of 3) [CW-18239/2025] assigned him correct seniority and others pecuniary benefits. 2. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondents No. 1, 3 and 4, and Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG for respondent No.2. Office is directed to reflect their names as counsel for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner while reliance upon order dated 04.07.2025 in S.B. CWP No.9839/2025 titled as Har Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that issues raised herein is already answered positively by a Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur vide judgment dated 20.12.2023 in S.B. CWP No.3837/2019 titled as Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. placing reliance upon judgment in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.763/2011 decided on 02.08.2011 titled as State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Banney Khan affirmed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 1766/2015 on 12.05.2015. 4. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter be disposed of in light of judgment in case of Amar Singh (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case, as claimed in the petition. 5. In view of above, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of judgment in case of Amar Singh (supra) and petitioner is also entitled to get benefit of selection scale, if the ratios is applicable in the facts of the case. 6. The respondents are directed to extend benefit to the petitioner if veracity of the facts mentioned by petitioner are found correct. [2025:RJ-JP:47772] (3 of 3) [CW-18239/2025] 7. Stay application and other misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /85