Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40429 (ALL)

RAM SAKHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12285/2025 · 2025-04-29

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67458 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12285 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Sakhi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manju Verma,Pradeep Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard Shri Pradeep Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dhananjay Singh, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 20.04.2023 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Kanpur-respondent No.2 in case No. 962 of 2022 under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by means of the impugned order, the learned Appellate Court, by allowing the respondent's appeal, set aside the order dated 28.04.2022 passed by the learned court below and remanded the matter to the court of learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, District-Farrukhabad-respondent No.3 to carry out the demarcation after affording opportunity of hearing to the appellant (respondent No.4 herein) within a period of two months. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that till date, no proceeding have taken place in compliance of the order dated 20.04.2023 . 4. During the course of argument, Shri Pradeep Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at this stage he does not want to press the prayer No.1 as made in the instant writ petition. He made a statement that he confines his prayer to the extent that a direction be issued by this Court to the learned court of Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Farrukhabad to comply the aforesaid order dated 20.04.2023, within the time frame as fixed by this Court. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State does not object the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeking a direction for early disposal of the matter. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Farrukhabad to conclude the proceeding and dispose of the matter in accordance with the direction issued by the learned Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Kanpur vide order dated 20.04.2023, within a maximum period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the court below. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Karan Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad