APHC010693812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35592/2025 Between: 1. PRASAD CHOWDARY ADDAGADDA, S/O HARI PRASAD RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/AT D.N0.6-3- 1219/1/3/F-1, C.S.R.JUBILENT RESIDENCY, LINE-1, UMANAGAR, KUNDAN BAGH, HYDERABAD-500 016 TELENGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS ARID REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517 501. 3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, NAYUDUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, or any other appropriate writ, order direction, declaring the oral refusal and inaction of the 3rd Respondent in accepting, processing, registering and releasing the Sale Deed pertaining to site situated at 4th ward. First Block, Vinnamala Village, Nayudupeta Municipality, Nayudupeta Mandal, Nayudupeta Sub-district, Tirupati Registration District, Tirupati District in Survey No.309, Plot No. 15, an extent 2 of 1300 Sq.ft, or 18 ankanams or 144 sq.yards, bounded on East G.N.T.Road, South Plot No.10, West Plot No.14 and North 20 ft road, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to forthwith accept, process and register the said Sale Deed presented by the Petitioner in accordance with law, within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to forthwith accept, process and register the said Sale Deed presented by the Petitioner in accordance with law pertaining to site situated at 4th ward. First Block, Vinnamala Village, Nayudupeta Municipality, Nayudupeta Mandal, Nayudupeta Sub-district, Tirupati Registration District, Tirupati District in Survey No.309, Plot No. 15, an extent of 1300 Sq.ft, or 18 ankanams or 144 sq.yards, bounded on East G.N.T.Road, South Plot No.10, West Plot No. 14 and North 20 ft road, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHU SUDHAN P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order, direction declaring the oral refusal and inaction of the 3rd Respondent in accepting, processing, registering and releasing the Sale Deed pertaining to site situated at 4th ward, First Block, Vinnamala Village, Nayudupeta Municipality, Nayudupeta Mandal, Nayudupeta Sub-district, Tirupati Registration District, Tirupati District in Survey No.309, Plot No.15, an extent of 1300 Sq.ft. or 18 ankanams or 144 sq.yards, bounded on East: G.N.T.Road, South: Plot No.10, West: Plot No.14 and North: 20 ft road, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to forthwith accept, process and register the said Sale Deed presented by the Petitioner in accordance with law, within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court and pass.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 19.08.2015 passed in WP No.26437 of 2015. 3. Learned Government Pleader did not oppose the said submission. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions and in the light of the above order of this Court, the respondent No.3 is directed to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner pertaining to the subject property, if it is otherwise in compliance of the provisions of the Indian Registration Act, 1899. If the Sub Registrar refuses to register, he has to pass reasoned order as mandated 4 under Section 71 of the Indian Registration Act, so as to enable the petitioner to prefer an appeal under Section 72 of the Indian Registration Act. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the parties. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 23.12.2025 SNI 5 46 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35592 OF 2025 Dt.23.12.2025 SNI