Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40427 (CHH)

BIJAU PANDRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/6916/2025 · 2025-09-02

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:44853 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6916 of 2025 1. Bijau Pandram S/o Shri Ramcharan Pandram Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Rali, Thana Toregaon Jungle, Distt. Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S. Taregaon Jungle, Distt. Kabeerdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Trivedi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 03.09.2025 1. This is the third bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 16.03.2024 in connection with Crime No. 06/2024 registered at Police Station - Taregaon Jungle, District - Kabirdham (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34, 12-0B, 147, 148 of IPC. 2. The first bail application filed by the applicant bearing MCRC No. 5302 of 2024 has been dismissed by this Court on merit vide order MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.09.04 10:59:35 +0530 2 dated 05.09.2024 and the second bail application filed by the applicant bearing MCRC No. 2357/2025 has been dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 25.03.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that as the applicant is in jail since 16.03.2024 and trial will likely to take some more time for its conclusion and would pray for releasing the applicant on bail. 4. This Court has called for status report of Session Case No. 32/2024 (State vs. Anjori Dhruve & Others) for commission of offence under Sections 148, 302/149, 120B, 201/149 of IPC. In pursuance of direction issued by this Court, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kabirdham vide letter dated 03.09.2025 has informed that only two witnesses are to be examined by the trial Court and the matter is fixed for 11.09.2025. 5. Since most of the witnesses have already been examined before the trial Court and the trial is likely to reach its logical end, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the instant bail application at this stage, as such, the instant bail application is liable to be disposed of. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish