[202] [1] M/s Ludhiana Construction Company Tejveer Singh, IAS and others [2] M/s Ludhiana Construction Company Tejveer Singh, IAS and others [3] M/s Ludhiana Construction Company Tejveer Singh, IAS and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] 09.05.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1602 Date of Decision : M/s Ludhiana Construction Company versus Tejveer Singh, IAS and others COCP-1642 M/s Ludhiana Construction Company versus Tejveer Singh, IAS and others COCP-1651 M/s Ludhiana Construction Company versus Tejveer Singh, IAS and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Senior Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the respondents. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel has produced speaking order(s) 09.05.2025 respectively in Court today. The same are taken on record. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1602-2025 Date of Decision : 12.05.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents 1642-2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents 1651-2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Senior Advocate with Advocate Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. Learned State Counsel has produced speaking order(s) dated respectively in Court today. The same are taken on record. dated RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.05.13 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-1602 connected cases [2] compliance of the order been passed cannot be sustained and prays with law against the speaking order [2] [3] cases. 12.05.2025 ‘R. Sharma' 1602-2025 and connected cases Counsel for the petitioner(s) does not dispute that in compliance of the order(s) passed by the Writ Court, speaking order been passed respectively. He however submits that the same is illegal and cannot be sustained and prays for liberty to avail his remedy against the speaking order(s) dated 09.05.2025 Allowed as prayed for. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected 12.05.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- Counsel for the petitioner(s) does not dispute that in passed by the Writ Court, speaking orders have . He however submits that the same is illegal and for liberty to avail his remedy in accordance (s) dated 09.05.2025. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Counsel for the petitioner(s) does not dispute that in ve . He however submits that the same is illegal and in accordance Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.05.13 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document