Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40422 (KAR)

SRI H R SATHISH v. TAHSILDAR

WP/25473/2022 · 2025-11-25

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48734 WP No. 25473 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 25473 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI H R SATHISH S/O LT H S RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SMT H S KALA W/O H R SATHISH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT HOSAGUTTI VILLAGE SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 235. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMAR RAM C M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TAHSILDAR SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT MADIKERI - 571 236. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADIKERI SUB DIVIOSN MADIKERI - 571 201. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48734 WP No. 25473 of 2022 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KODAGU DISTRICT MADIKERI - 571 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.07.2022 IN RA 51/2022 PASSED BY THE R3, KODAGU DISTRICT, MADIKERI CANCELLING THE GRANT OF LAND BY THE R1/LAND GRANT COMMITTEE, VIRAJPETE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out. 2. This Court vide order dated 14.11.2025 has passed the following order; "Office objections have not been complied with, despite several opportunities granted. Court fee is also not paid. It is made clear that if office objections are not cleared by the next date of hearing, the Court would be constrained to pass appropriate orders. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48734 WP No. 25473 of 2022 List this matter in 'orders' list for dismissal on 25.11.2025." 3. Today also counsel for the petitioners is absent when the matter is called out. This would clearly indicate that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64